Busting All the Propaganda About Islam: Truth, History, and Reality Explained in Depth

Busting All the Propaganda About Islam: In‑Depth Reality, Research, and Truth

Busting the first Propaganda: “Muslims Have Four Wives”

Reality Check: In Today’s World, Muslims Do Not Commonly Have Four Wives

One of the most repeated claims against Islam is that Muslim men freely marry four women even today.
This claim is misleading and disconnected from reality.

In the modern world, the overwhelming majority of Muslims have only one wife. Having four wives is extremely rare and socially uncommon.

What Islam Actually Says About Multiple Marriages

Islam does not command or encourage men to marry multiple women. It only permits it under very strict conditions.

The Quran states:

“Marry women of your choice, two, three, or four; but if you fear that you shall not be able to deal justly with them, then marry only one.”
(Quran 4:3)

This verse clearly establishes:

Multiple marriages are permission, not obligation
Justice and equal treatment are mandatory
If justice is not possible, only one marriage is allowed

For a detailed explanation, readers can verify this from a reliable source:
https://www.islamreligion.com/articles/325/an-introduction-to-polygamy-in-islam/

The Historical Context Behind This Permission

This rule did not come from desire or pleasure. It came from historical necessity.

In early Islamic history:

Islam faced long and continuous wars
Many young men died in battle
The male population declined sharply
The number of women, especially widows, increased significantly

At that time:

Women were not financially independent
Survival without male support was extremely difficult
Widows and orphaned women were vulnerable to poverty and exploitation

To address this social crisis, Islam introduced a solution:
If a man was financially, emotionally, and morally capable of supporting more than one woman with full justice, he was permitted to marry more than one.

This was a social welfare solution, not a sexual or religious demand.

Why This Is Not Relevant Today

Modern society is completely different:

Women are educated and financially independent
Social security systems exist
Long religious wars causing gender imbalance no longer exist

Because of this, the practical need for polygamy no longer exists.

As a result:

Most Muslim men marry only one woman
Many Muslim countries legally restrict or discourage polygamy
In real life, even two wives are rare, let alone four

Statistical and social data show that polygamy among Muslims today is uncommon and declining.

Important Clarification

Islam does not force anyone to marry multiple women
Islam does not reward multiple marriages
Islam prioritizes justice, responsibility, and social stability
Misusing this historical rule to attack Islam is intellectually dishonest

Final Conclusion

The idea that Muslims today commonly have four wives is a myth created by propaganda.
The permission for multiple marriages existed for a specific historical and social reason, not as a lifestyle rule.

In the modern world, Muslim society overwhelmingly practices monogamy, just like the rest of the world.

Busting the second Propaganda: “Islam Teaches Terrorism”

The Propaganda Claim

One of the most dangerous and widely spread claims is that Islam teaches terrorism or violence against innocent people.

This claim is false, misleading, and intellectually dishonest.

What the Quran Actually Says About Killing Innocents

The Quran is absolutely clear and uncompromising on the issue of killing innocent human beings.

It states:

“Whoever kills a person unjustly, it is as if he has killed all of humanity.”
(Quran 5:32)

This verse alone destroys the entire propaganda narrative.

The Quran does not permit:

Killing civilians
Killing non‑combatants
Killing people because of religion
Killing innocents in markets, trains, temples, mosques, or public places

Any act of violence against innocent people is explicitly forbidden in Islam.

An Important Principle Most People Ignore

Islam does not judge people by labels, but by actions.

If a person:

Claims to be Muslim
But kills innocent men, women, or children
Violates justice, mercy, and human dignity

Then that person is acting against Islam itself.

Such actions are anti‑Islamic, regardless of what slogans or religious language is used.

In simple terms:

A person who kills innocent people in the name of Islam is violating Islam, not representing it.

Terrorism Is Not Religious — It Is Political and Extremist

Terrorism is driven by:

Political agendas
Power struggles
Extremist ideologies
Manipulation of religion for control

Religion is often used as a tool, not the cause.

This is why:

Terrorism exists across different religions and ideologies
Extremists twist religious texts to justify their violence
The same pattern is seen globally, not only in Islam

Muslims Are Among the Biggest Victims of Terrorism

A fact often ignored in propaganda narratives is that:

The majority of victims of terrorist attacks worldwide are Muslims themselves
Terrorist violence has devastated Muslim communities across multiple countries
Ordinary Muslims live in fear of both extremists and the backlash created by them

This alone proves that terrorism is not working for Muslims, nor is it supported by them.

Position of Indian Muslims: Clear and Unambiguous

Indian Muslims have no association, sympathy, or connection with terrorists or extremist groups.

Indian Muslims:

Believe in the Constitution of India
Believe in peace, coexistence, and national unity
Reject violence and extremism completely

Their association is with positive contributors to the nation, such as:

Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam, who dedicated his life to India’s scientific and national progress
Allama Iqbal, whose philosophy inspired self‑development and intellectual growth
Historical figures who contributed to administration, culture, and resistance against colonial forces

Indian Muslims define themselves by nation‑building, not destruction.

The Correct and Responsible Way Forward

Terrorism must be dealt with:

Through strict law enforcement
Through intelligence and legal action
Through courts, due process, and constitutional authority

Any individual or group that engages in terrorism must face justice under the law, regardless of religion.

This approach:

Protects innocent lives
Preserves democracy
Prevents collective blame
Upholds moral and legal standards

Final Conclusion

Islam does not teach terrorism.
The Quran does not permit the killing of innocents.
Terrorists who claim religious justification are acting against Islamic principles, not for them.

Indian Muslims stand with:

Peace
Law
National unity
Justice

Equating terrorism with Islam is not only false—it damages social harmony and ignores reality.

Busting the Propaganda: The Word “Kafir”

The Propaganda Claim

A common allegation against Muslims is that they insult people of other religions by calling them “kafir,” and that the word is used as an abusive or hateful slur.

This claim is based on misunderstanding, not on the actual meaning or usage of the term in Islamic theology.

What the Word “Kafir” Actually Means

The word “kafir” comes from Arabic and has a specific theological meaning.
In Islamic terminology, it simply refers to a person who does not believe in Allah and does not follow Islam.

That is all it means.

It does not mean:

A bad human being
An inferior person
Someone deserving disrespect or harm

In simple terms, “kafir” is equivalent to “non‑Muslim” in a religious classification sense.

Why It Is Not an Abuse Word

Every belief system uses internal terms to describe who follows it and who does not.
For example:

“Believer” and “non‑believer”
“Christian” and “non‑Christian”
“Hindu” and “non‑Hindu”

Similarly, Islam uses:

Muslim for one who believes in Allah
Kafir for one who does not

This is categorization, not condemnation.

Calling someone “kafir” does not automatically mean hatred, insult, or disrespect. It is a theological label, not a personal judgment.

An Important Clarification About Respect

It is also important to be honest and clear.

If a Muslim says:
“You are a kafir,”
it does not mean that the Muslim is praising or respecting the other person’s beliefs.

At the same time, it also does not mean abuse or hostility.

It simply means:
“You do not believe in Allah.”

Islam does not force anyone to believe in Allah.
The Quran explicitly states that belief must be a matter of free choice.

So acknowledging that someone does not believe in Allah is not disrespect, it is recognition of a difference in belief.

Islam Does Not Teach Disrespect Toward Non‑Muslims

Islam strongly emphasizes:

Justice
Fair treatment
Peaceful coexistence
Respect for human dignity

The Quran instructs Muslims to deal justly and kindly with people of other faiths who live peacefully with them.

Disrespect, abuse, or humiliation of others is not an Islamic teaching.

How the Word Gets Misused

The problem arises when:

The word “kafir” is taken out of its theological context
It is deliberately portrayed as a hate word
It is used by extremists or uneducated individuals in a hostile manner

Such misuse does not represent Islamic teachings, just as misuse of any religious term does not represent the religion itself.

Final Conclusion

“Kafir” is not a swear word.
It is not an insult.
It is not a call for hatred or discrimination.

It is a neutral theological term that simply means “a person who does not believe in Allah,” or in modern terms, a non‑Muslim.

Equating this term with abuse is a result of propaganda, misunderstanding, and intentional distortion.

Differences in belief do not require hostility, and Islam does not teach hatred toward those who believe differently.

Busting the Propaganda: The Meaning of “Jihad”

The Propaganda Claim

One of the most widely spread and politically exploited claims is that the word “Jihad” means war, violence, or the killing of people, and that Islam encourages aggression through this concept.

This claim is factually incorrect and largely the result of political propaganda, selective interpretation, and deliberate misrepresentation.

The Actual Meaning of Jihad

The word “Jihad” comes from the Arabic root jahada, which means to strive, to struggle, or to make a serious effort.

In Islam, Jihad does not automatically mean war, and it certainly does not mean terrorism or killing innocent people.

At its core, Jihad refers to any sincere struggle undertaken for moral, ethical, and spiritual improvement.

The Greatest Form of Jihad

According to Islamic teachings, the greatest and most important form of Jihad is the internal struggle.

This includes:

Controlling one’s anger
Resisting ego and arrogance
Avoiding immoral actions
Fighting injustice within oneself
Choosing honesty, patience, and discipline over temptation

This internal struggle is lifelong and continuous, and it applies to every Muslim, regardless of time or place.

This concept alone makes it clear that Jihad is primarily about self‑reform, not violence.

Jihad and Warfare: A Very Limited Context

Islam does recognize that, like any society, Muslims may face situations of oppression, persecution, or physical attack.

In such cases, armed struggle is permitted only as self‑defense, and even then, it is surrounded by strict moral and legal rules.

Islamic law explicitly forbids:

Killing innocent civilians
Harming women, children, or the elderly
Attacking non‑combatants
Destroying places of worship
Committing acts of revenge or cruelty

Any act that violates these principles cannot be considered Jihad, even if someone claims it in the name of religion.

Terrorism Is the Opposite of Jihad

Terrorism involves:

Targeting innocent people
Spreading fear among civilians
Ignoring moral and legal limits
Pursuing political or ideological power through violence

These actions directly contradict Islamic teachings.

Therefore, labeling terrorist violence as “Jihad” is not only incorrect, but also a gross distortion of Islamic principles.

The Role of Political Propaganda

Much of the fear surrounding the word “Jihad” has been deliberately created by:

Politicians seeking votes through fear‑based narratives
Media outlets oversimplifying complex religious concepts
Extremist groups misusing religious language for political goals

In many cases, the word “Jihad” is intentionally reduced to “holy war” because it serves political interests, fuels division, and simplifies narratives for mass consumption.

This propaganda ignores centuries of Islamic scholarship that clearly define Jihad as ethical struggle, discipline, and moral responsibility.

How This Misrepresentation Harms Society

When Jihad is falsely equated with terrorism:

An entire community is unfairly stereotyped
Peaceful citizens are treated with suspicion
Social harmony is damaged
Extremists gain attention they do not deserve

This misrepresentation benefits no one except those who thrive on fear and division.

Final Conclusion

Jihad does not mean terrorism.
Jihad does not mean killing.
Jihad does not mean hatred.

Jihad means struggle, primarily the struggle to become a better human being, and only in rare and strictly regulated circumstances does it refer to physical defense.

Reducing Jihad to violence is a political and ideological distortion, not an honest understanding of Islam.

Understanding this difference is essential for building an informed, peaceful, and fair society.

Busting the Propaganda: The Concept of “Halala”

The Propaganda Claim

One of the most emotionally charged accusations against Islam is that Halala is a sexual system designed to exploit women, and that Islam encourages or institutionalizes this practice.

This claim is false and arises from a serious misunderstanding and deliberate misrepresentation of Islamic marital law.

First and Most Important Clarification

Halala is not a rule created by Islam.
There is no command in Islam that instructs anyone to perform Halala.

What people call “Halala” today is actually a by‑product of divorce laws being misunderstood, misused, or intentionally exploited, not a religious obligation.

What Islam Actually Says About Divorce

Islam treats marriage as a serious, respectful, and long‑term commitment, and divorce is allowed only as a last option.

Islamic teachings clearly state:

Divorce should not be given in anger
Divorce should not be rushed
Reconciliation should always be attempted first
Separation is allowed only when living together becomes impossible

This alone shows that Islam does not encourage frequent divorce or casual separation.

The Actual Rule Behind the Confusion

Islamic law states the following principle:

If a man divorces his wife with a final and complete divorce, then:

That woman becomes unlawful (haram) for him
He cannot remarry her immediately

Now, if that woman:

Marries another man naturally and genuinely
Lives a normal married life with him

And later:

The second husband passes away, or
The second marriage ends naturally through divorce

Only then does the woman become lawful (halal) again for the first husband, meaning she may remarry him if both freely choose to do so.

This rule exists to prevent men from treating divorce lightly and to stop the cycle of repeated divorce and remarriage without responsibility.

The Critical Point Most People Ignore

The key condition here is intention.

If the second marriage happens:

Naturally
Without pre‑planning
Without any agreement to divorce later
Without being done solely to make the woman “lawful” again

Then it is valid.

However, if:

A second marriage is arranged intentionally
With a pre‑decided plan that the husband will divorce the woman or marry her only temporarily
Solely to make her permissible again for the first husband

Then this act is strictly forbidden (haram) in Islam.

This is the so‑called “Halala” that people criticize — and Islam itself condemns it.

Why Forced or Planned Halala Is Wrong

Forced or pre‑planned Halala:

Exploits women
Turns marriage into a transaction
Violates consent and dignity
Directly contradicts Islamic ethics

Islamic scholars across centuries have clearly declared such practices sinful and invalid.

Therefore, blaming Islam for Halala abuse is like blaming a law for crimes committed by people who intentionally break it.

The Real Purpose of This Rule

The purpose of this rule is:

To protect women from being divorced and taken back repeatedly
To make men think seriously before giving final divorce
To preserve the dignity and seriousness of marriage

It was designed as a deterrent, not as a system to be practiced.

Final Conclusion

Halala is not an Islamic rule.
Islam does not promote or encourage it.
Forced or planned Halala is explicitly forbidden.

What is often shown as “Islamic Halala” is actually a misuse of religious law, done by individuals for convenience, control, or manipulation.

Calling this misuse a religious command is propaganda, not truth.

Islam’s real position is clear:

Divorce should be rare
Marriage should be respected
Women’s dignity must be protected
Exploitation in any form is unacceptable

Busting the Propaganda: “Islam Is Anti‑Science”

The Propaganda Claim

A very common accusation is that Islam is against science, rational thinking, and modern education, and that Islamic teachings discourage scientific inquiry and intellectual development.

This claim is historically false, intellectually weak, and politically motivated.

What Islam Actually Teaches About Knowledge and Science

Islam does not oppose science; in fact, it actively encourages thinking, questioning, observation, and learning.

The Quran repeatedly asks human beings to:

Think deeply
Observe nature
Reflect on the universe
Use reason and intellect
Seek knowledge continuously

The very first word revealed in the Quran was “Read”, which clearly establishes learning as a foundational value.

Islamic teachings consider the pursuit of knowledge a moral responsibility, not a luxury, and this includes religious as well as worldly knowledge such as mathematics, medicine, astronomy, and philosophy.

The famous Islamic principle that “seeking knowledge is obligatory” clearly shows that ignorance is not a religious ideal in Islam.

The Golden Age of Islam: When Science Flourished

Between approximately the 8th and 14th centuries, the Muslim world experienced what historians call the Golden Age of Islam, a period when science, philosophy, medicine, mathematics, and technology reached extraordinary levels of development.

During this time:

Scientific research was encouraged
Libraries, universities, and observatories were built
Scholars of different religions worked together
Knowledge from Greek, Persian, Indian, and Roman sources was preserved and expanded

This era directly contributed to the foundation of modern science and the European Renaissance.

Major Muslim Scientists and Their Achievements

Here are some well‑known Muslim scholars whose contributions shaped the modern world:

Al‑Khwarizmi
Known as the father of algebra; the word “algorithm” comes from his name. His work laid the foundation for modern mathematics and computer science.
Ibn Sina (Avicenna)
One of the greatest physicians in history; his book The Canon of Medicine was used as a medical textbook in Europe for centuries.
Al‑Biruni
Made major contributions to astronomy, physics, geography, and anthropology; calculated the Earth’s radius with remarkable accuracy.
Ibn al‑Haytham
Known as the father of modern optics; introduced the scientific method based on experimentation and observation.
Al‑Zahrawi
A pioneer of surgery; developed surgical instruments that are still referenced in modern medicine.
Jabir ibn Hayyan
Considered the father of chemistry; introduced experimental methods and chemical processes still used today.

These achievements alone completely destroy the claim that Islam is anti‑science.

Then Why Are Many Muslim Countries Scientifically Backward Today?

This is a political and social problem, not a religious one.

Today, there are more than 50 Muslim‑majority countries, but in many of them:

Education systems are weak
Scientific research is underfunded
Religious education is often limited to temporary or narrow instruction
Critical thinking is discouraged

The primary reason for this is political leadership, not Islam.

In many such countries, political leaders prioritize:

Staying in power
Controlling public opinion
Preventing questioning and dissent

When children are educated in science, logic, philosophy, and modern academics, they begin to:

Think rationally
Ask questions
Demand accountability
Challenge corruption and misuse of power

This threatens authoritarian leadership.

As a result, science and critical education are often neglected or suppressed, while limited forms of education are promoted to keep populations intellectually dependent.

An Important Truth That Must Be Stated Clearly

Islam did not ban science.
Islam did not suppress innovation.
Islam did not oppose rational thinking.

It was politicians, dictators, and power‑hungry rulers who:

Misused religion
Controlled education
Suppressed intellectual freedom
Destroyed scientific institutions

Blaming Islam for these failures is historically inaccurate and intellectually dishonest.

The Irony of the Situation

The same civilization that once:

Led the world in science
Produced the greatest scholars of their time
Preserved human knowledge when Europe was in darkness

Is today accused of being anti‑science, while the real reason for decline is political corruption and misuse of power.

Final Conclusion

Islam is not anti‑science.
Islam is anti‑ignorance.

The Quran encourages learning, observation, and reasoning.
Muslim scholars laid the foundation for modern science.
The decline of scientific progress in some Muslim countries is the result of political failure, not religious teaching.

Equating Islam with ignorance is propaganda created by those who either do not know history or choose to ignore it.

Busting the Propaganda: “Muslims Believe in Killing Non‑Muslims”

The Propaganda Claim

A widely repeated accusation is that Muslims believe it is acceptable to kill non‑Muslims simply because of religious difference, and that Islam promotes violence against people of other faiths.

This claim is completely false and contradicts the core teachings of Islam, the Quran, and the historical conduct of Muslims.

What the Quran Clearly Says About Killing Innocent People

The Quran makes an unambiguous and universal statement regarding the value of human life:

“Whoever kills an innocent person, it is as if he has killed all of humanity.”

This declaration does not differentiate between Muslim and non‑Muslim.
It does not create categories of acceptable victims.
It establishes a universal moral principle: the life of every innocent human being is sacred.

According to Islamic teachings, killing an innocent person is one of the gravest sins, regardless of the victim’s religion, race, or background.

Islam’s Principle of Peaceful Coexistence

Islam teaches peaceful coexistence with people of all faiths, provided there is no aggression or oppression.

Muslims are instructed to:

Act with justice toward everyone
Respect human dignity
Honor agreements and treaties
Live peacefully alongside other religious communities

The Quran does not command Muslims to harm non‑Muslims; rather, it instructs them to deal fairly and ethically with all people.

The Example of Prophet Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him)

The life of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) provides the strongest evidence against the claim that Islam promotes violence against non‑Muslims.

When he was spreading Islam in Arabia:

He was insulted
He was mocked
Stones were thrown at him
He was physically injured by non‑Muslims who opposed him

Despite this severe persecution, he did not respond with revenge or violence.

Instead:

He prayed for those who harmed him
He asked God to guide them, not punish them
He chose patience, mercy, and forgiveness over retaliation

This behavior was not weakness; it was moral strength.

Muslims consider themselves followers of this example.
Coming from such a tradition, the idea that Muslims would be taught to kill people simply for religious difference is logically and morally inconsistent.

Justice, Not Revenge, Is the Islamic Principle

Islam does not support mob violence, revenge killings, or collective punishment.

If a person commits murder, terrorism, or any violent crime:

That person is guilty as an individual
The crime must be judged under law
Punishment must come through a legal and judicial process

Justice does not depend on religion.
Whether the criminal is Muslim or non‑Muslim is irrelevant.

What matters is the crime, not the identity.

Islam supports accountability, not chaos, and law, not vigilantism.

Historical Reality of Muslim Rule

Historically, Muslim civilizations ruled over regions containing:

Hindus
Christians
Jews
Buddhists
Other religious communities

These societies did not survive for centuries through mass killing or forced violence.
They survived through administration, coexistence, and legal systems that allowed multiple religions to live together.

This historical reality directly contradicts the propaganda narrative.

Why This Propaganda Exists

This false claim exists because:

Extremist actions are wrongly generalized
Political narratives benefit from fear
Religion is blamed instead of criminals
Context is deliberately removed from religious teachings

A criminal who commits violence does not represent Islam, just as criminals do not represent any faith or community.

Final Conclusion

Islam does not teach Muslims to kill non‑Muslims.
The Quran strictly forbids the killing of innocent people.
The Prophet of Islam responded to violence with patience and prayer, not bloodshed.

Muslims believe in justice through law, not revenge through violence.
Any individual who kills innocents must face punishment under the law, regardless of religion.

Equating Islam with a killing ideology is not truth—it is propaganda created by fear, ignorance, and political misuse.

The Final Message

We, Hindus and Muslims, have lived together for centuries and fought side by side in the struggle for independence. So why today, under the influence of political propaganda, are we getting drawn into religious conflicts? Why are leaders inciting us against each other in the name of religion? No religion teaches us to oppose another — Islam does not say oppose Sanatan Dharma, Sanatan Dharma does not say oppose Islam, no Ram commands fighting Allah, and Allah does not command fighting Ram.

When we raise our voices, let us raise them for the right causes: against corruption, against unemployment, against poverty, against rising crime and rape cases, for political reforms, for a better education system, and for a stable and prosperous life for everyone.

We must stand together, united as Indians, focusing on justice, progress, and truth, rather than letting propaganda divide us.

Sources of Research & References

The information presented above is based on academic research, international studies, historical records, and globally recognized educational and development sources that have examined madarasa education, cognitive development, moral education, and historical contributions of Islamic institutions.

1. UNESCO – Education, Ethics & Inclusive Learning

UNESCO has repeatedly emphasized that value-based education, moral learning, and community-centered institutions play a crucial role in character development and social harmony.
🔗 https://www.unesco.org/en/education

2. Pew Research Center – Religious Education & Social Impact

Pew Research provides data-driven studies on religious institutions, education systems, and their role in shaping social behavior, discipline, and ethics.
🔗 https://www.pewresearch.org

3. Oxford Islamic Studies – History of Madrasas

Oxford’s academic resources explain how madrasas historically functioned as centers of advanced learning in law, philosophy, logic, mathematics, and ethics.
🔗 https://www.oxfordislamicstudies.com

4. Britannica – Madrasas and Intellectual Development

Encyclopaedia Britannica documents the role of madrasas in developing analytical thinking, jurisprudence, language mastery, and leadership skills.
🔗 https://www.britannica.com/topic/madrasa

5. World Bank – Education, Discipline & Human Capital

The World Bank highlights how structured education systems with strong discipline and moral grounding contribute to long-term human capital development.
🔗 https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/education

6. Al-Azhar University (Cairo) – Classical & Modern Madarasa Model

One of the world’s oldest and most respected Islamic institutions, demonstrating how madarasa education integrates theology, logic, language, and modern subjects.
🔗 https://www.azhar.eg

7. Harvard Divinity School – Religion, Ethics & Society

Harvard’s research explores how religious education contributes to ethics, leadership, emotional intelligence, and social responsibility.
🔗 https://hds.harvard.edu

8. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs – Madrasas & Modern Society

Peer-reviewed research analyzing madarasa education, reforms, misconceptions, and real-world outcomes.
🔗 https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/cjmm20/current

Important Note for Readers

Madarasas, like any educational institutions, vary widely in quality and approach. The benefits described apply to authentic, well-regulated madarasas that focus on knowledge, ethics, discipline, and coexistence, not to institutions that misuse religion for political or extremist purposes.

Stay United, Jay Hind! Jay Bharat!

Search This Blog

The Infinity of Words